Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Book Review

Live Love Light
An Anthology of poems by Parneet Jaggi
Published by Writer Workshop, Kolkata
ISBN 978-93-5045-93-2,
Total Page 76, Year 2015, Prize 150

Life is a great mystery. Poetry comes to convey this mystery and its meaning to the dwellers of the world. To understand poetry is perhaps more difficult than to write it simply because the poet is alone when he meditates and compose poem. But when a poem reaches in the hands of various kinds of persons, the man who interprets it has to be more cautious than the poet himself because the interests, the nature and intellectual gifts of all persons differ from one another in every respect. Some poets do not require any interpreters because they write in a simple way. Their poetry is thought provoking and philosophical. Parneet is one of such poets. She makes effort to organize her thoughts and feelings into a coherent, unified worldview. Her poems record thoughts and feelings experienced naturally over the course of life. Her second anthology Live Love Light the best example of this.
Live Love Light is a bunch of fifty eight beautiful poems written in a very reflective mood by a sensitive and spiritually inclined personality. In the very first poem ‘Lesson of Life’ Parneet yearns to surrender herself to the divine design. Her staunch faith in God is clearly visible. She was born in a Sikh family and Sikhism is the thread which binds all the poems in this anthology.
In Sikhism, it is claimed that only in human form, the living entity has the intelligence to understand divine laws and thus the soul could hope to free itself from the cyclical bondages of births, deaths and rebirths. It is asserted that the soul has ability to reach God only after being born in a human body. This thought is inherent in the poems of Live Love Light.    
In ‘Surrender’ she is very close to Swami Vivekananda who in his poem ‘Quest for God’ sings:
…….. it is He.
When dire calamity seizes me,
The heart seems weak and faint,
All natures seems to crush me down,
With laws that never bend.
Me seems I hear Thee whispering sweet
My love, "I am near", "I am near". 

            ‘Shower of Joy’ reminds me W. H. Davies’ poem ‘Leisure’. In the similar mood she says that beauty is scattered in nature around us and we have no time to look and enjoy it, perhaps because “We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!”  So, she suggests “Let us relish showers of joy/and drive away all the gloom.” In ‘Chords’ she says that the things of nature and the events of world definitely cause trouble and vexation of spirit. In ‘Karma’ she marvels “Logic fails to calculate karmas/ Why need a record?” In poem ‘Brick and Cement’ she points out that all desires that perplex and bewilder us are certainly false and meaningless as they cannot satisfy and give happiness to us.
‘Go Home Ma’ is one of the best poems in English poems that I have read on the subject female foeticide. The consolation give by unborn girl to her mother definitely has power to bring tears in the eyes of humanity. In this anthology two poems are explicitly written on women: one is ‘The Woman’ and another is ‘Joys of a Woman’. Through poems like ‘God Chose You’, ‘A Free Gift’, ‘A Gift’, ‘The Ultimate Dwelling’ Parneet presents herself a very sensitive thinker and spiritually inclined poet. In the poem ‘Pain of a Koel’ she explodes the popular myth that Koel’s song is synonymous with beauty and perfection. The song is not of fullness and fertility but of the pangs of separation. Even the song of a koel is unable to express the depth of its sorrow.     
 Parneet’s greatest achievement as a poet of inwardness is her brilliant, diamond-hard language. Word and mood are intrinsically woven in the poems of Live love light. She writes aphoristically, meaning that she compresses a great deal of meaning into a very small number of words even then this can not make her poems hard to understand on a first reading.

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Shakespeare in Indian Literature and Cinema


William Shakespeare, a born genius, myriad minded and skilled artist has a prominent place not only in English Literature but also in Indian Art and Literature. He has captured heart of all readers and in all ages. His plays have a special appeal on us –the Indians and that is why we enjoy his plays before we actually understand them.
It was 1775, when during American war of independence many things came to India from England and Shakespeare was one of them. It was he who touched the very heart and soul of Indian writers and scholars. And since then he has been the source of inspiration for countless writers, scholars, artists and film producers in India.
Shakespearean Literature has definitely crossed the limits of time and space and has been reigning in the literary world of different countries and different languages for centuries. In India the bard has become an inevitable part of the curriculum for teaching English in various universities and school boards. Critics feel that the striking peculiarity of Shakespeare’s mind was its generic quality, its power to communicate with minds so that it contained a universe of thought and feeling within itself.          He might be nothing in himself but he was all that others were or they could become.
It is generally believed that Richardson was the first who created literary taste for Shakespearean drama in the minds of Indian audience and the students of Bangal in the beginning of 19th century. Richardson was a teacher and he used to teach his students how to recite and act the scenes of Shakespearean plays. In 1837, first time some students from Bangal performed The Merchant of Venice in the house of Governor. In 1853 students of Oriental Academy staged Othello.  The same group of students performed The Merchant of Venice in 1854 and Henry IV in 1855.
In 1868, Oriental Theatrical Company came into existence in Mumbai. After that some Parsi companies took over the task to play Shakespeare’s dramas in various parts of India. Actually these companies or theatrical groups paved the way for Shakespeare in Indian art and cinema.   These groups did a lot to popularise the bard in Indian society in local language. King Lear as Haar jeet in 1902, Twelfth Night as Bhool Bhuliayan (1905) and Anthony and Cleopatra as Kali Nagin are some of the translations by Parsi companies. But later translations like Raja Lear in 1915 and Measure for Measure as Bagula Bhagat in 1923 are perhaps better translations than the earlier ones. Translation of Shakespearean plays was first published in a magazine named ‘Shakespeare’ brought out by Narayan Parsad ‘Betab’ (1872–1945)
It is true that Shakespeare has been quite papular through translation and adaptation on Indian stage. Scholars and audience may have their own reasons for liking him; readers of all generations are attracted towards him. His plays have been translated in almost all Indian languages. In 1957-58 Rangeya Raghav translated fifteen plays in Hindi. Great writers of Hindi Literature like Harivansh Rai Bachchan, Amrit Rai and Raghuveer Sahey also tried their hands to translate the immortal plays of Shakespeare. Recently Surjeet Hans, a retired professor from Punjabi University, translated all plays of the bard in Punjabi.
Hindi writers and playwrights like Jai Shankar Prasad and Upender Nath ‘Ashq’ adopted Shakespearean plays in their different creations. These masters took hints from the bard’s plays and used them in their own creations in a different manner. For example some critics trace Lady Macbeth in the character of Anant Devi in the famous play Skandgupta by Prasad, Chacha Beta of ‘Ashq’ resembles with King Lear, Sanjogita Swayamvar by Shreenivas Das has the antecedents of The Merchant of Venice. Our national leaders like Pt. Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi were also influenced by Shakespeare. It is said that Pt. Nehru culled an epigraph from Shakespeare’s sonnet in his book The Discovery of India.
The themes of Shakespearean drama are beautifully woven in the texture of Indian cinema. Noted Bollywood director Vishal Bharadwaj quoted as saying: 'Shakespeare is the greatest storyteller ever. His stories have layers of spectacular human drama. I think they can be adapted anywhere and in any language. I can live my whole life on Shakespeare.' Adapting Shakespeare's work to Indian ethos is the latest 'in' thing. After critical acclaim for the 'Macbeth'-inspired 'Maqbool', director Vishal directed 'Omkara' - based on 'Othello' with the badlands of Uttar Pradesh as background and Haider –based on Hamlet with the background of Kashmir. Vishal is not the first to adapt Shakespeare. The prolific writers have been adapting earlier in Bollywood productions. Some Bollywood blockbusters, including 'Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak', were said to be inspired by 'Romeo and Juliet'. Likewise, Gulzar's acclaimed 'Angoor' was based on 'The Comedy of Errors'. Director Sohrab Modi recreated Hamlet in his 1935 film, Khoon ka Khoon, with some scenes even utilising a portrait of Shakespeare as a prop. And the list is very long.
Habib Tanveer not only translated many plays of Shakespeare in Chhatisgarhi dialect but also adopted the same style, prose and blank verse in his writing and made the bard available in the remote area of rural India. The finest example is Kam Dev ka Apna Basant Ritu ka Sapna which is the translation of Mid Summer Night Dream.
Shakespeare is universal. It is his vision of life and art that cross the boundaries of culture, space and time. In his own words:
              How many ages hence
             Shall this our lofty scene be acted over

             In states unborn and culture unknown.    

Monday, 5 January 2015

Gandhi on Education

Nation is to commemorate century year of Mahatma Gandhi’s return to India from January 2015. With the arrival of Gandhi a gust of fresh thoughts rejuvenated India. He through his speeches and writings touched every cord of Indian life and education is one of them.  Gandhi’s views on education have been compiled and edited in two slim books, Basic Education (1951) and Towards New Education (1953).  These writings are mostly miscellaneous, consisting of letters, speeches, extracts from books, and so on, but together they may be taken to constitute a coherent philosophy of education.

            Mahatma Gandhi had read Emerson, Ruskin and Mazzini. He also had read The Upanishads. All confirmed the view that education does not mean knowledge of letters but it means character building, it means knowledge of duty. This belief is articulated in his life and works. He believes that generally people do not have any idea of what true education is. We assess the value of education in the same manner as we assess the value of land or of shares in the stock exchange. We want to provide only such education as would enable the students to earn more. We hardly give any thought to the improvement of character of the educated.
In a letter to his son Ramdas, Gandhi writes: “True education lies in serving others; oblige them without the feeling of one-uppishness. ... I am not worried about your bookish learning as long as you perform your duties and observe solemn ethical conduct. For me carrying out fundamentals of ethics is duty.” For Gandhi to do good to others and serve them without any sense of egoism – is the real and true education.   
According to Gandhi the true occupation of a man is to build his character. It is not necessary to learn something special for earning. Gandhi was of strong belief that the man who does leave the path of morality never starves. So he advises his son in a letter that learning to live a good life is in itself education. All else is useless.
In his book Hind Swaraj he writes: “What is the meaning of education? It simply means knowledge of letters. To teach boys reading, writing and arithmetic is called primary education. A peasant earns his bread honestly. He has ordinary knowledge of the world. He knows fairly well how he should behave towards his parents, his wife, his children and his fellow villagers. He understands and observes the basic rules of morality. But he cannot write his own name. What do you propose to do by giving him knowledge of letters? So the knowledge of letters does not make men of us. It does not enable us to do our duty.”
He once said that education is that which helps us to know the atman, our true self; God and truth. To acquire this knowledge, some persons may feel the need for a study of literature, some for a study of physical sciences and some others for art. But every branch of knowledge should have as its goal knowledge of the self. That is so in the Ashram. Students carry on numerous activities with that aim in view. All of them are, in Gandhian sense of the term, true education. Those activities can also be carried on without any reference to the goal of knowledge of the self. When they are so carried on, they may serve as a means of livelihood or of something else, but they are not education. In an activity carried on as education, a proper understanding of its meaning, devotion to duty and the spirit of service are necessary.
Gandhi was of firm belief that literary education should follow the education of the hand- the one gift that visibly distinguishes man from beast. He says that it is a superstition to think that the fullest development is impossible without the knowledge of the art of reading and writing. That knowledge undoubtedly adds grace to life, but it is in no way indispensible for man’s moral, physical or material growth. His purpose is to “put training in craft on the same footing as education in letters. Those who thoroughly understand this point will never be eager for a literal education at the training in craft. Their book-learning will shine better and also prove of greater benefit of the purpose.” In this way, Gandhi wants our education has to be revolutionized. The brain must be educated through the hand. He asks, “Why should you think that mind is everything and hands and feet nothing?” Those who do not train their hands and go through the ordinary rut of education, lack ‘magic’ in their life. An education which does not teach us to discriminate between good and evil, to assimilate one and eschew the other is a misnomer. 
Gandhi says that there are certain aims of education and first of them is nationalism. He writes that education is just a means. If it is not accompanied by truthfulness, firmness, patience, and other virtues, it remains sterile and sometimes does harm instead of good. The object of education is not to earn money, but to improve oneself and serve the country. If this object is not realized, it must be taken that the exchequer spent on education has been wasted.
Indian community must realize that without the right kind of education the community will not only remain backward, but become increasingly so. Knowledge is justified only when it is put to good use and employed in public cause.
Addressing students at YMCA, Madras on April27.1915 he asks: “Are you receiving an education which will make you worthy to realize that ideal which will draw the best out of you, or is it an education which has become a factory for making Government employees or clerks in commercial offices? Is the goal of the education that you are receiving that of mere employment whether in the Government departments or other departments? If that be the goal of your education, if that is the goal that you have set before yourselves, I feel and I fear that the vision the Indian society pictured for itself is far from being realized.”
  In Young India, (1 October, 1919) he writes “If education is to be bought at the price of manliness and self-respect, the price is too heavy. ‘Man does not live by bread alone.’ Self-respect and character are above means of livelihood or a career. I am sorry that so many students have taken their expulsion so much to heart. The parents as well as students must revise their ideas about education. Education is treated merely as a means of earning a livelihood and acquiring a status in society. These are not unworthy ambitions. But they are not everything in life. There are many other honourable means of acquiring wealth and status. There are many independent activities in life which one may undertake without having to contemplate loss of self-respect. And there is no better or cleaner passport to status in society than honesty and selfless service of fellow-beings. If, therefore, after due effort, the college door remains banged in the students’ faces, they should not lose heart but seek other means of livelihood. And if the other students will empty the recalcitrant colleges as a matter of respectful protest, they and India will not be losers, but both will be considerable gainers.”
Fearlessness is the foundation of all education, the beginning and not the end. Purity of personal life is the other indispensable condition for building a sound education.
Gandhi exhorts that teachers must be men or women of high moral character. Conditions must be created to enable the poorest Indian to receive the best possible education. There must be a happy union of literary knowledge and Dharma. Education must be related to the conditions of life in our country. And the heavy burden on the minds of young men resulting from the use of an alien language as the medium of instruction must be removed. Unless education is reshaped so as to fulfill the foregoing the level of the life of Indian people cannot be raised. True national education should be imparted through the language of each province. The teachers must be men of high ability. The school should be located at a place where students would get clean drinking water, pure air and a peaceful atmosphere. The surroundings must be perfectly healthy. The scheme of education must provide for securing to the students knowledge of the main occupations and religions of India.
In Harijan 2 November 1947, he writes that the Basic Education has grown out of the atmosphere surrounding us in the country and is in response to it. It is, therefore, designed to cope with that atmosphere. This atmosphere pervades India’s seven hundred thousand villages and its millions of inhabitants. Forget them and you forget India. India is not to be found in her cities. It is in her innumerable villages.
The following are the fundamentals of Basic Education:
1. All education to be true must be self-supporting, that is to say, in the end it will pay its expenses excepting the capital which will remain intact.
2. In it the cunning of the hand will be utilized even up to the final stage, that is to say, hands of the pupils will be skillfully working at some industry for some period during the day.
3. All education must be imparted through the medium of the provincial language.
4. In this there is no room for giving sectional religious training. Fundamental universal ethics will have full scope.
5. This education, whether it is confined to children or adults, male or female, will find its way to the homes of the pupils.
6. Since millions of students receiving this education will consider themselves as of the whole of India, they must learn an inter-provincial language. This common inter-provincial speech can only be Hindustani written in Nagari or Urdu script. Therefore, pupils have to master both the scripts.
Gandhian educational ideas, founded as they are on certain eternal principles, will not lose their fundamental relevance in the years to come. Policy makers will have to think of a self-supporting primary education, which will improve the lot of the poorest of the poor.  That such an education would be based on action, problem-solving, and practical activity, rather than mere book learning is also perfectly valid.  An integral education, which allows the whole being of a person to grow, an education which emphases character-building and cultural identity, is once again, obviously desirable.  It is equally clear that nation has failed miserably in state-sponsored schemes to provide free, compulsory primary education to all.  The Gandhian model, therefore, retains its relevance and attractiveness. 
References:
Gandhi, M. K.  Basic Education.  Bharatan Kumarappa, ed.  Ahmedabad:  Navjivan,
1951.

-----. Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule.  1909; Ahmedabad: Navjivan, 1984.

-----.  Towards New Education. Bharatan Kumarappa, ed.  Ahmedabad:  Navjivan, 1953.

Varkey, C.J.  The Wardha Scheme of Education:  An Exposition and Examination.
Madras:  Oxford University Press, 1940.